Warning: This is another of my more technical posts. There are no pretty pictures.
This post addresses two parts of the HVAC system, the
Heating and the Air Conditioning. The
other part of HVAC, Ventilation, will be addressed in another post.
In Michigan, most people install a natural gas forced air
furnace and air conditioning. Those
willing to spend money on a premium system consider radiant floor heating. However, highly insulated houses have some
differences from typical houses which can change what types of heating a
cooling systems are appropriate. Homes
which take insulation and air tightness to extremes, such as those that conform
to the
Passivehaus standard, usually end up with different types of heating and
cooling systems, such as one or two mini-split ductless heat pumps. In terms of insulation, this house falls into
a middle ground between typical houses and Passivehaus houses. So, it wasn’t obvious whether our systems
should be like typical houses, like Passivehaus houses, or some other choice. (Well, maybe it would have been obvious to
someone with less tendency than me to over-think these things.)
Highly insulated houses have a much lower heating demand
than typical houses. Why wouldn’t they just
use smaller versions of same types of systems that typical houses use?
- Mainstream HVAC equipment manufacturers don’t attempt
to serve the highly insulated house market.
The range of equipment sizes offered is based on typical house heating
loads. In fact, most equipment installed
in typical houses is considerably oversized.
- Distributing heat is easier in a highly
insulated house since the heat is not escaping as quickly. That opens up some possibilities. However, the warm floor feeling that many
people like about radiant floor heating would not be so noticeable in a highly
insulated house.
- People interested in net-zero homes prefer all-electric
systems, which can be supplied by PV panels.
- Ironically, spending more for highly efficient
equipment is less likely to pay off in a low load home. People who have spent extra money for insulation
may want to recoup some of that by spending less on heating and cooling
equipment.
For any type of equipment, the first step is to calculate
the design heating and cooling loads. The
heating load includes heat lost through walls, windows, ceiling, etc. due to
conduction and also heat lost due to air leakage and forced ventilation. For my location, the design heating load is
calculated at 7 degrees F. Although the
temperature gets colder than this, it rarely stays colder than this for long
periods. The design heating load ignores
various internal heat gains like solar gain through the windows, use of the
fireplace, appliances, and people. These
heat gains, and the thermal mass of the house and contents, sustain the inside
temperature when the outside temperature drops below the design
temperature. Also, the equipment is
usually sized at least a little larger than the design heating load. The design heating load came out to 34,000
btu/hr. The design cooling load, which
is calculated at 88 F, came out at 18,000 btu/hr. Design cooling load does include some
internal gains.
The first option I considered was a ground source heat pump
(sometimes called a geothermal heat pump).
Instead of creating heat by burning fuel, a heat pump moves heat that
already exists. To move a btu of heat
from a cold place to a warm place requires energy but, if the temperature
difference is small enough, it requires less than a btu of energy. The advantage of a ground source heat pump is
that the heat is being moved from the ground which, in theory, is a constant,
moderate temperature. The heat is
extracted from the ground by fluid that flows through buried tubes. In summer, the same process is used to
transfer heat into the ground to provide air conditioning. Unfortunately, heat transfer from solid
ground is not very efficient. A lot of
tube must be buried to transfer enough heat, which gets expensive. Even then, the temperature of the dirt near
the tubes is not constant due to the heat being extracted. I was dissuaded by a number of
articles on
Green Building Advisor that found that the extra efficiency of a ground source
heat pump relative to a modern air source heat pump is not worth the additional
cost.
That takes me to the next option I considered – mini-split heat
pumps. These move heat from the outside
air. Traditionally, air source heat
pumps have been out of favor in cold climates because the capacity and
efficiency declines when the outside temperature gets lower. However, technical advances have made them a
practical cold climate alternative. A
ductless mini-split provides the conditioned air directly to the room as
opposed to blowing air through ducts.
This improves efficiency but requires equipment on the wall which raises
an aesthetic concern. Another issue is
how well the heat is distributed from these units to other rooms. A ducted mini-split can serve several rooms though
a small duct network. Ducted units give
up a little of the efficiency but improve heat distribution. One thing that builders of super-insulated
houses like about mini-splits is that they are available in small capacities –
as low as 6000 btu/hr. They use
electricity instead of natural gas which is great if you want to use PV panels
to achieve net zero. In Michigan,
however, electricity is much more expensive than natural gas.
A related option is an air-to-water heat pump, such as the
Chilltrix system. Whereas a mini-split
relies on refrigerant lines between the outdoor unit and the indoor unit, an
air-to-water heat pump retains all of the refrigerant within the outdoor
unit. The heat is transferred between
indoor and outdoor units by water lines.
This enables smaller indoor units.
Other than this distinction, the advantages and disadvantages of air-to-water
heat pumps are similar to those of mini-split heat pumps.
Eventually, a fuel price comparison convinced me that a
natural gas solution made more sense than an electric solution. Some builders of low load homes have taken
advantage of relatively low natural gas prices by installing a combination space
heating and domestic hot water system (sometimes called a combi-system). Domestic hot water is supplied by an
efficient natural gas water heater, such as an
HTP Phoenix Light Duty. Hot water is circulated through coils in a
hydronic air handler to provide space heating.
Trying to get local contractors to quote and install a combi-system
proved difficult.
In the end, I decided on a conventional natural gas furnace. The smallest size most companies offer in most
models, including their modulating models, is 60,000 btu/hr. (An exception is a Canadian company called
Dettson that sells
modulating furnaces starting at 15,000 btu/hr. I ended up ruling out this option due to
unfamiliarity to local contractors.) However,
some two-stage high efficiency furnaces are available with an input capacity of
40,000 btu/hr. The output capacity is 25,000
btu/hr on low stage and 39,000 btu/hr on high stage which is a good match for
the house’s heating load. The smallest available
air conditioning unit is 1 ½ tons which is a good match for the cooling load.
The British say that Americans can be counted on to do the
right thing, but only after they have tried everything else. I guess I am willing adopt the conventional solution,
but only after I have ruled out all other possibilities.