Warning: This post is more technical than most others.
When I first set out to design our house, I didn’t think
very much about construction technology beyond trying to assure myself that
what I designed was feasible to construct without extreme costs. (Some of my early designs would have failed
that test.) I set out to learn enough
about house construction to assure myself that I wasn’t specifying something
stupid. I discovered the very
interesting field of building science.
At websites like Green Building Advisor and Building Science Corporation, I found smart people
debating how to go beyond stupidity avoidance to make houses more comfortable,
more durable, and more energy efficient.
(Stupidity avoidance continues to be an important aspect of building
science.) Although builders in my region
have adopted standard methods that are used on the vast majority of houses, there
are alternatives to these standard methods.
Should I be using these alternatives?
After considerable research, I have decided to depart from standard
practice for my region in a couple ways.
One such departure is adding a layer of exterior rigid foam.
The primary functions of the exterior walls
are separating the interior from the exterior and holding up the roof and
higher floors. Ensuring that the walls
will continue to perform these functions well for many years requires a structure
that avoids rot, by keeping any wood parts from being warm and wet
simultaneously. A second function of the
exterior walls is to limit heating and cooling loads. This function requires avoiding the flow of
air between inside and outside and resisting heat conduction. The traditional approach to resisting heat
conduction is to fill the areas between the studs with insulation. Once this is done, the studs themselves
become a “thermal bridge” providing a path for heat to flow around the
insulation.
A traditional residential wall in Southeast Michigan has
wood studs that carry the vertical loads, OSB sheathing to provide rigidity,
housewrap to keep out bulk water, and some form of cladding like siding or
brick veneer. There is typically
cellulose or fiberglass insulation between the studs and drywall on the
interior. Some air from inside the house
typically gets past the drywall into the wall cavity. In Winter, water vapor in that air is
adsorbed by the OSB sheathing which is cold.
Hopefully, wetness in the sheathing dries out by vapor diffusion in Spring
before the wall gets warm enough for rot to form. To reduce heat conduction, 2x4 studs have given
way to 2x6 studs, increasing the effective R-value of the wall from about 9 to
about 14. Although the nominal R-value
of the insulation is greater than that, the effective R-value of the wall is
reduced by thermal bridging through the studs.
A number of alternative wall stuctures are in use. One approach to reducing the thermal bridging
of the studs is to increase the space between the studs from 16 inches to 24
inches. Another approach is a double
stud wall which has an inner set of studs and an outer set of studs separated
by a few inches. Usually only one set of
studs supports the weight of the roof and upper floors. Taping the seams between OSB panels reduces
air leakage through the wall. Some
builders use a layer of spray foam between studs to reduce air leakage. Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) rely on
OSB layers bonded to each side of a rigid foam layer to support the structure,
eliminating most of the studs (except where SIPs are joined to one
another). Insulated Concrete Forms
(ICFS) use continuous rigid foam layers on the outside and inside to provide
R-value and use steel reinforced concrete in the middle to provide the
structure and the air barrier. By
eliminating wood, ICFs avoid wood rot.
Each of these alternatives have advantages and disadvantages.
After studying alternatives, I decided on the wall structure
illustrated above. Two inches of
continuous rigid foam insulation is attached to the outside of the OSB
sheathing. I selecting Platinum
Insulfoam EPS which provides R-5 per inch.
Since this is not reduced by thermal bridging, the effective R-value of
the wall increased from about 14 to about 24.
One drawback of rigid foam is that it dramatically limits drying to the
outside in Spring. Therefore, it is
important to use a thick enough layer of rigid foam to keep the sheathing
warmer than the dew point during the winter such that the sheathing does not
adsorb water. In climate zone 5, where
this house is located, R-7.5 is enough to accomplish that.
One of the most problematic air leakage areas is the rim
joist. To address this, peel and stick
flashing is added on the outside and spray foam is applied to the
interior of the rim joist. As shown in
the picture below, spray foam is also used at the top of the walls to join the
OSB sheathing, which is the air barrier for the walls, to the drywall which
forms the air barrier for the ceiling.
On the outside of the rigid foam, 3/4 inch furring strips
create an air gap called a rain screen. The
air gap allows the cladding to dry from both sides and prevents vapor that may
be driven out of the cladding by sunshine from going into the wall
structure. Screws through the furring
strips into the studs secure the rigid foam to the wall. Some areas of the house will have brick
veneer cladding while other areas will have Hardi-Board fiber-cement siding.
In the basement, two inches of foam separate the poured
concrete foundation wall from a framed wall, keeping all of the wood above the
dew point. I looked into alternatives to
poured concrete basement walls, such as Superior Walls. The Superior Wall system uses wall sections
pre-manufactured in a factory and assembled on site. The wall sections include insulation, which
would have allowed elimination of the interior framed wall. Although there are some advantages to the
Superior Walls system, I concluded that those advantages were not sufficient to
depart from the system my builder is familiar with.
No comments:
Post a Comment